1994: Publishing comes to the Web — and design matters
1994 marks the Web’s shift into a publishing medium. As site authors seek control over formatting and design, the WWW-Talk mailing list hosts an early debate over style sheets and presentation.
If web design is not yet a profession in 1993 because of the technical limitations of HTML and early browsers, then 1994 is the year web authors start asking the question: why can't we control formatting and presentation? At this point, the leading browser vendors — first Mosaic and then Netscape — see layout as their responsibility.
What little was possible in visual design for website authors in 1994 is dictated by the capabilities of Mosaic and the newly launched Netscape Navigator. As the year progresses, sites grow slightly more sophisticated in their use of images and graphical icons, but authors still cannot choose fonts or control background colour. And while tables appear as an experimental layout feature in some browsers by late 1994, they don't become a practical design tool until 1995.
Should browsers define layout?
At the start of 1994, there was general acknowledgment amongst the participants of the WWW-Talk mailing list that web authors had limited control of layout and presentation — it simply wasn't specified in HTML at the time. So in the absense of styling controls in HTML, early browsers implemented their own presentation ideas. On February 17, 1994, Mosaic's Marc Andreessen left the following comment after a user complained about "an extra blank line" on his HTML menu:
"It's not a bug -- it's a rendering choice made by the browser. As we kneel before the altar of the "ha ha, you can't control what your documents look like in HTML" philosophy, you, dear sinner (nay, blasphemer), can but take solace in the fact that Mosaic is putting a blank line at the start of all toplevel lists, including yours, entirely on purpose. (Why? Primarily because we thought that looked the best for most documents on the Web at the time, as I remember.)"
Although Andreessen's tone was snarky, he had a point: if HTML won't specify how a document should look, then it's up to browsers to make those decisions. HTML was never designed to be a formatting language; its purpose was (and still is) to define the structure of a web page. Indeed, Tim Berners-Lee wrote in his 2025 memoir that he originally viewed HTML as "plumbing" for the Web.
Even in early 1994, there were active discussions about introducing "style sheets" to the Web. This wasn't a new idea, either. As the W3C's Bert Bos wrote many years later:
"The separation of document structure from the document's layout had been a goal of HTML from its inception in 1990. Tim Berners-Lee wrote his NeXT browser/editor in such a way that he could determine the style with a simple style sheet. However, he didn't publish the syntax for the style sheets, considering it a matter for each browser to decide how to best display pages to its users."
Perhaps that explains why Marc Andreessen was skeptical about style sheets. On February 28, 1994, he complained that "style sheets are an artificial construct inflicted on us because of the whole non-presentation philosophy we've been using." His point was that browsers should continue to handle layout and that a new styling language would add too much complexity.
Others on the WWW-Talk list disagreed. Mark Fisher argued that "attaching style sheets to documents would allow authors to get their message across in the format they intended" and would reduce the "typographical errors" users were seeing.
The shift to web publishing
These arguments over web standards can look dry and pendantic when read many years later, but what they demonstrate is a real desire for the Web to be more than a system for sharing documents. It was becoming clear that users of the Web in 1994 increasingly saw it as a new publishing medium, which meant a need for design tools.
The momentum to add style sheets grew during the second quarter of 1994, as WWW-Talk members pushed back against the idea that browsers should control layout. In summarizing a recent standards meeting, Yechezkal-Shimon Gutfreund noted in May that "many people would like to have more control over the actual rendering of the document (alignment, font size, tabbing, highlight color, etc, etc.)" Rob Raisch agreed, pointing out that style sheets were very important for the future of web publishing:
"Tools like Mosaic are only really useful to the end-user. They support few of the requirements a publisher looks for in a publishing platform."
Although some people supported Andreessen's stance to keep it simple, a consensus was slowly forming to give web publishers better ways to control formatting. Chris Lilley, a computer scientist who would go on to co-author the graphics formats PNG and SVG, argued on the WWW-HTML mailing list that it was entirely reasonable "to have some control over formatting AS WELL AS sending searchable, parsable text."
In other words, he didn't view having control over the design of a web page as being incompatible with machine-readable text. While the Web's primary purpose was to be a global hypertext system, that didn't mean it couldn't look good too.
In a follow-up, Lilley noted "that commercial sites want a corporate look, an image, and are prepared to pay real money to get it."
CSS proposed and Netscape launches
October 1994 was a key month for the now fast-growing Web.
On October 10, 1994, a new styling standard was proposed by Håkon Wium Lie, a colleague of Tim Berners-Lee at CERN. Lie called his proposal "Cascading HTML style sheets" and wrote that the goal was to provide "a simple mapping between HTML elements and presentation hints." The word "cascade" referenced an ordered list of style sheets, which was Lie's way of giving the end-user some control over formatting — for example, a sight-impaired user might want to make the text on a web page much larger than the author had declared.
Lie's proposal came out around the time of the launch of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), a new governing body for the Web led by its inventor, Tim Berners-Lee. Also in this month, Netscape — a new company formed by Andreessen and Jim Clark in April — launched a beta version of its first product, a web browser initially called Mosaic Netscape 0.9 (later renamed Netscape Navigator).
There was a delicate balance between the growth of web standards, now being managed by the W3C, and the launch of new commercial companies like Netscape. But as more and more people started using the Web, inevitably they tended to use the most popular web browser — Mosaic, in either its original form or the new Netscape version. Both these products still only supported basic HTML elements (HTML 2.0 was a new proposal under discussion at this point) and style sheets weren't anywhere close to being in the picture.
That was the problem with web standards: they took years to be formalized, and thus supported.
Website design in 1994
By the end of 1994, there were roughly 10,000 websites on the web. It was still early days and most of the websites were quite basic in structure. The Solstice website for the Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology (CREST) in Switzerland is a good example. The layout is very simple, since tables weren't an option yet, but there are some nice graphics at the top of the page that give the page a splash of color.
At the bottom of the Solstice homepage, there is even a graphical menu system — using the traditional "Index" and "Next" navigation system. But note that the typography is basic; this is because authors couldn't choose which fonts their pages would render in.
Some of the more adventurous websites of 1994 used more graphics, but they were still quite primitive in terms of layout. An unofficial website for The Rolling Stones is a good example. The site, stones.com, had been created by some tech-savvy fans from MIT, along with the computer software company Sun Microsystems. According to the launch announcement in September 1994:
“With the help of Sun Microsystems Inc., Thinking Pictures [an MIT spinoff] has put the Rolling Stones on-line, creating their own electronic "home page," a user-friendly graphical interface for navigating information across the global Internet.”
Although it wasn’t an official website, Thinking Pictures CEO Stephan Fitch told media that “the site has the blessings of the Stones.”
The graphical interface mainly consisted of small icons, many using familiar images (a CD icon for the "Albums" page, etc.). But there were a few custom-made icons too — notably the famous Rolling Stones tongue for the home page.
The stones.com website had been built by Björn Tromsdorf, whose personal homepage further showcased his icon designs. It also featured a typical 1994 design pattern for personal websites: a pixelated photo followed by your name in headline text (just as common would've been to write "Björn's Home Page").
One of the most innovative website designs of 1994 was Microsoft's homepage, which used an image map for its navigation system. In a reconstruction of the site in 2014, the web design firm Paravel commented:
"It's a very simple site, but recreating the Image Map navigation was the biggest piece of the puzzle. The image was excellently recreated by Dan Schlitzkus. We converted it to a GIF, but it's possible it could have been an X-BitMap which was in use around the time."
Paravel deduced that the original page likely used a server-side CGI image map using the <IMG ISMAP> attribute, part of the HTML 2.0 draft specification that was being hammered out over 1994.
Paravel's Dave Rupert later told Creative Bloq that "replicating the original Microsoft.com homepage after helping redesign its modern counterpart felt like restoring an old Mustang."
I'll have more online Mustangs to show off in the next post in Cybercultural's history of web design (1993-2012), so stay tuned and subscribe to be notified if you haven't already.
Buy the Book
My Web 2.0 memoir, Bubble Blog: From Outsider to Insider in Silicon Valley's Web 2.0 Revolution, is now available to purchase:
- Paperback, US$19.99: Amazon; Bookshop.org
- eBook, US$9.99: Amazon Kindle Store; Apple Books; Google Play
Or search for "Bubble Blog MacManus" on your local online bookstore.